data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0ee10/0ee109e1de4c53e075207e4ed3da4f71d286c9e7" alt=""
However, this fantastical relationship is portrayed quite differently in the 1964 movie. At the beginning of the same scene, Titania dances with the changeling boy-- the center of the conflict. That brief interaction establishes their close relationship, one of a mother and son. Her unwillingness to give him up is justified by this interaction. When they run into Oberon, the tone of the scene changes. No one frolics; they freeze. Titania looks horrified; Oberon looks angry. The music drops ominously. Clearly, the two are locked in a not-so-friendly conflict. In this adaptation, Oberon uses a commanding tone in order to establish his dominance here. Titania plays her role with the knowledge she is defying her husband and king, and yet cares enough for the changeling that she is willing to stand against his wishes. Unlike the almost sheepish Oberon in the Rice production who simply wants the conflict to end (and kind of enjoys the seductive element of the argument), this Oberon refuses to look at his wife or acknowledge her interest in the halfling. She cares about the boy, not a larger game or a power struggle, but to Oberon, her defiance exhibits a struggle for his power. Because of this characterization, his love potion plot is less about resolving the conflict or amusing himself and Puck, but is about regaining control and enacting revenge. Oberon's manipulative behavior because of Titania's genuine interest in the boy paint their relationship as a subservient, traditional marriage rather than a match of intellectual equals playing games to amuse and seduce each other.
That's really interesting.... It really goes along with what we talked about in class a few weeks ago, about how much the different aspects of production (cast, venue, diecting, acting, etc.) can really have such an influence on the play. No wonder there are so many interpretations of Shakespeare's works.
ReplyDeleteThis reminds me about the feminist interpretations of the play. I feel like with these two versions of the play, it becomes obvious how hard it is to say whether the play is for or against women. It is all about the interpretations the directors decide on. They can make Titania and Oberon equals or they can make Oberon more aggressive and domineering and Titania more passive.
ReplyDeleteI didn't see the 1964 version, but in the Rice University version (from what I saw and from what other people have been saying about it) it seems that they were really trying to make the female characters seem more dominating. I wonder if one reason for this is that nowadays we're more easily offended by women being portrayed as weak than audiences would have been in the 60's.
ReplyDelete