In Shakespeare’s Henry
V, Henry is often seen as a manipulative figure who uses his powerful
rhetoric in order to accomplish a self-serving political agenda. Arguably,
Henry’s greatest power is his rhetoric, and critics often cite this as his most
manipulative tool-the means though which he accomplishes his own selfish
desires. Rather than praising his rhetorical abilities, critics question
Henry’s motives and point to his rhetoric as the proof of his manipulation.
However, “The
Role of Sympathy in Henry V’s Rhetoric” provides a different view of Henry.
I argue that because Adam Smith’s concept of sympathy contributes a great deal
to the foundation of rhetoric, Henry’s character changes. The role that
sympathy plays in Henry’s rhetoric changes Henry from a solely manipulative
individual to a character able to feel and identify with his audiences.
Understanding the role sympathy plays in rhetoric is crucial to understanding
Henry.
is this edited since the one you sent me? i definitely like this stance better. much more clear! Reading your paper as we speak--sorry it's taken so long.
ReplyDeleteI think after reading your paper all the way through , i think this opening paragraph is much more directed, especially since you so heavily use Smith's work! The direction seems clear. I like how you're using the text to illustrate the selfish vs. sympathetic Henry.
ReplyDeleteKara, you are a wonderful human being! Thank you for looking at it!
Delete