---
Mallory
Brugger
Dr.
Burton
English
382
5
November 2012
Making Shakespeare Applicable
Shakespeare’s
Othello contains many lessons that are applicable and important for
secondary students to understand. Lessons like trust, honesty, and communication
are important at every stage of life, and especially important during the
formative years of middle and high school. As well as being valuable and
instructional to students, educators would do well in becoming comfortable with
these themes and the emotional needs that their students have.
Teaching
Shakespeare in schools is important for many reasons. One reason is because
Shakespeare is so prevalent in pop culture. I was on Facebook the other day and
witnessed the following conversation: “Dad: ‘To be or not to be; that is the
question.’ Zach (little brother): ‘Wasn’t that Yoda who said that?’” This
conversation alerted me to a disconnect that exists between these “mysterious
words” and their source. At least the younger brother was aware that there was
some significance to the words. That’s a start. And if the disconnect wasn’t
bad enough, the first comment is, “oh sad day… need to set that kid down with
some Shakespear!” “Shakespear” without an “e.” It seems like the woman who
commented also could have used some Shakespeare knowledge under her belt.
Secondary
students often complain about having to study Shakespeare, and some of the
complaints are ones that I have voiced myself from time to time. The plays seem
long and threatening, the language is hard to understand, it is hard to follow
the plot, or visualize the scene, or the play doesn’t “read well” because it is
a struggle to remember who is speaking. Once students finally feel like they
are grasping it, the teacher them opens up new directions and ways of thinking
and suddenly a passage that was starting to become clear is complicated again.
Educators teaching Shakespeare have to be careful to find the balance between
opening new horizons and information overload.
So
what is the balance? One Shakespeare educator, Dianne Madsen counseled, "Students need to come away from reading any Shakespeare play
with a deeper
appreciation of his insight into human nature. Shakespeare was the greatest
of all psychologists! He was a genius in knowing what people will do
in virtually all situations. He understood why people act the way they do:
what they fear, what they want, and these insights can be useful in the lives
of your students. Find ways to help students relate these play to their own
lives, their own insecurities. 'This above [all] to thine own self be true.'"
Secondary
education is an age of finding yourself, and figuring out where you fit in
among the many different social groups. Many of Shakespeare’s characters
struggle to find their place. Othello struggles to reconcile the differing
messages he is receiving, Desdemona has to try and convince Othello that she is
true, and Hamlet struggles to come to terms with his mother’s marriage to his
uncle.
This
essay will focus on two of Shakespeare’s most well-known (and most often
taught) plays, Othello and Hamlet. Both have men of tremendous
potential who allowed others to poison their lives. One of Madsen’s goals in
teaching Shakespeare was “to help [students] understand themselves and others
better” and I think that is an excellent point. Shakespeare’s works provide
great insight into human nature, and educators are missing a valuable
opportunity to help students relate to literature if they allow Shakespeare to
slip by.
One
of the most prevalent themes in Othello is that of trust. High school
students are no stranger to the idea of trust, because they are interacting
with each other in a trusting environment daily. They are not unfamiliar to the
ups and downs of relationships, and so they understand the complex feelings of
jealousy that Iago voices in the opening lines of the play. He says, “Nonsuits
my mediator; for ‘Certes,’ says he, / ‘I have already chosen my officer.’ / And
what was he? / … One Michael Cassio … That never a squadron in the field, / Nor
the division of a battle knows.” Iago at this point in the play seems to be
voicing common concerns, he feels that he is more qualified for the military
position than Michael Cassio is, but there is nothing that he can do about it,
especially as he is now under the command of Cassio.
Hamlet
has a similar experience. After seeing his father’s ghost, Hamlet allows the
vision to consume his thoughts. He becomes more and more fixated on destroying
his uncle and ruins Ophelia’s life, and his own, in the process. Both Hamlet
and Othello can be blamed for the death of the woman they love. Hamlet’s
obsession with his uncle is ultimately his demise, although unlike Othello, he
brings this destruction upon himself instead of being destroyed through the actions
of another character.
When
teaching this to a secondary audience the teacher can share alternate
experiences of characters who allowed themselves to be destroyed because of the
actions of other people (King Lear, for example, allowed his pride to get in
the way of what was truly happening) or ask the students to do the same. Hamlet
chooses to let his rage consume him, and Othello is not a play about a lost
opportunity as much as it is about Iago’s choice to let the lost promotion
destroy him, and ultimately many of the characters around him. Iago’s choice to
turn his anger into a mechanism to destroy the lives of Cassio, Othello,
Desdemona is a example of rage taken too far. This is an opportunity to present
to students that their actions influence people other than themselves. It is an
extreme example, but also leads to a discussion about communication.
Hamlet
never talks to his uncle about the situation, and the only conversation he has
with his mother is far less than complimentary (EXAMPLE COMING SOON). It is
impossible to predict the ending of the play had Hamlet chosen to “talk it out”
(and it could be that doing that would have left readers with a less
“satisfying” and potentially juvenile ending), but there is a good chance that
things could have turned out differently.
Othello’s
case is much more blatant. If Othello had talked to Desdemona and actually
listened to her, there is a good chance that she would have remained alive. But
maybe that is Shakespeare’s point. Perhaps he is illustrating the most extreme
cases in order to warn his readers of the dangers that follow lack of
communication.
In
order to be successful, educators need to be aware of the problems that are
facing their students. They need to appreciate the social pressures and needs
that students have and find a way to make the literature appeal to those
problems. Educators who take the time to address the issues of trust and
communication through the literature they teach in an engaging way will find
that their students are more receptive and will help their students realize
that Shakespeare is more than just Old English and complicated sonnets. They
will find that the Bard really can apply to their lives and even help them find
solutions to their problems.
I really enjoyed how you brought social learning into your paper. I thought that how you implemented that social interaction really brought home the point that Shakespeare needs to be taught in a different way in schools than maybe it has been taught traditionally. I would definitely try to get more social input from students to enhance your paper even more!
ReplyDeleteGreat start! I agree that Shakespeare's works delve into the core of human nature and deal with themes and challenges common to all, regardless of the centuries separating us from his day. I learned lessons about love and respect for others, regardless of racial, cultural or religious differences, as well as the importance of being true to my own beliefs during my high school studies of "The Merchant of Venice," and "Othello" that changed the course of my life and helped shape the person I am today. I like the fact that you demonstrate the importance of communication and trust in marriage through Othello and Desdemona's relationship. Definitely a real-life application kids need to learn today.
ReplyDeleteI love this idea. I think one thing you could work on is the argument about Shakespeare being part of pop culture. I liked the example you gave, but it was hard to see why it was important. Like, why does it matter if the boy knew who said that? or why does it matter if the woman knows how to spell Shakespeare? Obviously, you'll be able to find answers to these questions and it's not that complicated, but just make sure you actually do explain WHY it's important.
ReplyDeleteTo me it looks like you've sharpened a research question: to what extent does the study of Shakespeare relate to teen psychology or development? You might even claim that studying Shakespeare in one's formative years is critical (though I can think of counter-arguments, too...) because his works illustrate common issues of teen angst, young love, etc. I encourage you to research in the literature of psychological development and adolescence to see if anyone has approached the teens and Shakespeare thing (as has been done in part with the Ophelia Syndrome--which could be part but not all of your findings).
ReplyDeleteIt would be a good idea to get other Shakespeare students in our class chime in on how the plays they are researching might have a teen angle. And it would be good to get feedback from actual teens who are studying Shakespeare.