Sunday, September 13, 2015

Choosing the Simpler World

A Midsummer Night's Dream has always been one of my favorite plays, and not just because I killed it in 8th grade as Oberon. There is something about the unpredictable exaggeration of the fairy world that amplifies societal strictures across all three groupings of characters. Puck and Oberon's separate attempts at wooing, for example, lead with the assumption of male superiority. However, there is so much more nuance to that than popular interpretation seems to allows for.

Neil Gaiman just gets Shakespeare.


However, as I explored supplemental reading in preparation for class, I was alarmed and frustrated with how often the women-are-property argument was used. While Shakespeare's complex handling of gender dynamics evolved over his career, Shakespeare rarely is so overtly general with his gender roles. I feel that if anything the chaos of switching affections and supernatural machinations take the power of sexuality away from either gender and emphasizes its uncontrollable nature. The temperamental elements of the fairy world parallel nature more than they parallel the social construction of human society. Shakespeare makes a strong case for attraction being beyond human control. I mean, how else do you account for Helena's irrational love of Demetrius? There is none.

Over simplifying this conflict guts the implications of Ass-Bottom and Titania's fling. By using a natural element--a flower--Oberon and Puck bend the rules of society, nature, and choice (specifically the idea of love being a choice) to topple Titania's resolve against her union with the fair king.

Neil Gaiman takes this conflict a step further in his Sandman comic when he draws Oberon's court into the human realm to enjoy a performance of the play. Dream, the primary character, mediates the encounter, bridging the staunch humanism of the actors and the more animalistic nature of the fairies. They dynamics leap off of the page and add an interesting context to the original source material.

(Also, this is a really interesting combination of a staged adaptation accompanied by the original text.)

3 comments:

  1. After reading your post, I can see how the play was commenting on how love can not be controlled. Even when Oberon and Puck were trying to make Demetrius love Helena, things when wrong and they had to fix it. Although they could make someone fall in love with the flower, they had no true control over who that particular person saw when they first woke up. And concerning Helena, she had no control over her feelings because she couldn't stop loving a man who originally hated her.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I was thinking about this a lot while reading the play. The idea of love being out of our control, or even "fate" coming into play is touched upon with the fairies in this play, and as someone else pointed out, by the witches in Macbeth.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Okay, I've heard a lot of good things about Neil Gaiman and Sandman in particular. How do you think your reading of that comic furthers your understanding of the fairy vs. human worlds? Does it emphasize nature over societal constructs?

    ReplyDelete