Wednesday, April 17, 2013

Submitted once, offered twice...we'll see what they say!

I submitted my essay to ScholarsArchive, and sent an email to

This Rough Magic
A Peer-Reviewed, Academic, Online Journal
Dedicated to the Teaching of Medieval and Renaissance Literature

and

Stage Mom Musings

art is everything & everything is art

with this abstract: 
Shakespeare has made his way from the heart of commonplace Globe attendants, through the minds of scholarly experts and into the adolescent classroom. As an icon in the history of written English literature, Shakespeare has influenced writers for centuries. Now, thousands of ninth grade students study Romeo and Juliet and other plays each year. The universal themes promoted by Shakespeare’s myriad of publications as well as his stylistic prowess in make his work a popular part of high school English syllabi. However, arguments about the psychological and academic impact of these plays on today’s youth present a contrary argument. This paper will show how teachers can be wise in selecting a Shakespeare text for their classroom and the best methods to teach this material in a way that will engage, motivate, and educate their students.


Wish me luck!

Nyssa's Learning Outcome Reflections

Gain Shakespeare Literacy

Breadth: Over the course of the semester, I read at least one play from each of the major genres of Shakespeare: Taming of the Shrew, a comedy; Henry V and Richard II, histories; A Winter's Tale, a romance; and  King Lear, a tragedy. Through reading these plays, I was able to expand my knowledge of Shakespeare from what I had acquired during high school, which focused mostly on the tragedies. And, since I read the Digital Dialogue posts and research papers of other students in the class, I feel at least conversant in other Shakespeare plays, as well as the general character and plot types that Shakespeare often uses.

Depth: Before this semester, I had only the vaguest of ideas of what King Lear was about. Now, after closely reading it, researching it, watching a film adaptation of it, and writing a paper about it, I feel confident in my knowledge of that play. I read it at least twice through this semester, and I think part of the depth requirement is feeling deeply as a response to the play. My paper really helped me emotionally tap into the play in a way that I find difficult for most other texts. I can immerse myself into the tragic examination of family relationships and old age because of my deep involvement with and understanding of the text.

Performance, stage and screen: I only got to watch one stage adaptation this semester, Henry V, but I watched film adaptations of Taming of the Shrew, Henry V, and King Lear. I was able to sharpen my film analysis skills through examining choices made in the adaptation, and overall what I learned was the flexibility and creativity involved in adapting Shakespeare plays. Especially helpful for me was realizing that Henry V has been portrayed as both rah-rah patriotism and harmful jingoism throughout the years, a difference I hadn't really thought possible before researching adaptations. I can now comment more intelligently on the differences between film and stage adaptations and the original Shakespeare text.

Legacy (history, scholarship, popular culture): My first paper on Taming of the Shrew really helped me understand the historical context of Shakespeare's plays, as did reading and commenting on other students' papers. For Paul's paper, for instance, I had to remind myself of the religious relations of Shakespeare's time to help him work through potential pitfalls in his argument. And though I nearly neglected the scholarly tradition for blindness in King Lear in my fervor over disability studies, Dr. Burton pushed me in the right direction and helped me acknowledge the traditional approach to the play in scholarship. Reading other students' papers also got me interested in all sorts of Shakespeare scholarship that I wouldn't have had time to research on my own. It's harder to gauge my increased knowledge of Shakespeare in popular culture, but I have been able to integrate ideas and quotes from Shakespeare into my everyday life; I was even able to identify a misplaced Shakespeare quote in an early draft of David's paper.

Analyze Shakespeare Critically

I found that the more I was forced to articulate what I thought about the plays, either through writing in forums, blogs, and papers or through recording my thesis video, the more intelligently I was able to read the plays. I really developed my close reading skills (kind of my most prized skill from the English major) in being able to write a paper that revolved around them; I was able to take both scholarly traditions and historical context into account when reading a play and use these contexts in tempering my claims. I feel like I did a pretty good job over the course of the semester about avoiding easy arguments and Shakespeare platitudes, and my paper displays the consideration I took over multiple facets of an argument.

Engage Shakespeare Creatively

Like everyone else is going to say, the sonnet project helped me be creative with Shakespearean material. I really enjoyed the time I spent trying to get my meter down perfectly. Also, though, the Youtube videos I made, though I didn't really edit them much at all, let me know that more creative ventures are possible further in the future. It's not an impossible thing to make videos, and I'm excited about having that realization.

Share Shakespeare Meaningfully

Most of my Shakespeare sharing came from talking things over with my husband, Neal. I got used to talking about a books that (gasp!) many people have actually read. On the one hand, this means that I might not get to used the most developed forms of my arguments, but it helped me figure out what approaches to the texts would matter to and be understood by most people. Talking through my arguments with my peers in class really helped me fight my way out of the worst parts of academese, so now I'm prepared to enter the real world with experience writing (another gasp!) readable prose.

Gain Digital Literacy

This is the part of the class that I struggled with the most. I felt like I had to prove myself in my topic before asking people for their input on it, so that really hampered my outreach. I was also discouraged when most of the people I reached out to didn't get back to me. But I did learn how to search through blogs and social media to find things that people are talking about, which will be useful in the future far beyond a class on Shakespeare. I did, however, gain some bravery in talking to other people on the Internet, so I'm at least glad I gave the digital aspect of this class a try. I feel a little more connected with people in the world--like I can at least ask people questions without being terrified of what will happen.

Reflecting on our learning outcomes....



1. Gain Shakespeare Literacy 
a. Breadth (knowledge of a range of Shakespeare's works); I believe I gained this by reading many a play this semester. Additionally, by reading and discussing research papers of other students, I was able to learn more about plays that I still haven't read.
b. Depth (more thorough knowledge of a single work); I definitely got my fill of Henry V this semester. I'm proud that I feel like I know the play fairly well. By reading it in class, seeing the play, the movie AND writing a research paper on it, I definitely got the most out of this work.
c. Performance (stage and screen); I learned that just doing one of these things isn't enough for me. To get the fully experience, I have to do multiples: watch AND see. This way it's solidified in both words and actions. When I watch I pay less attention to the words. When I read, I can't picture the scenes as well because I'm trying to decipher the words! Both is better.
d. Legacy (history, scholarship, popular culture); Through my social media efforts, I've realized that there are a lot of people out there outside of schools who still care a lot about Shakespeare. It's been eye opening to see online discussions and other student blogs trying to accomplish the sames things that we are.

Submitted!

Submitted to the scholar's archive! Hang tight for other publication venues...

Submitting, A Story

I have successfully submitted my paper to the Scholar's Archive at BYU (after checking over it once again to make sure I haven't accidentally mis-cited things), as instructed!

I have also submitted my paper to BYU's Criterion.  While discussing my paper with Dr. Burton, he mentioned that my paper is less of an academic one, so a blogging atmosphere might be more appropriate for it.  I did want to try to submit it to a journal, so I felt this would be a more willing one, but if it isn't accepted to the Criterion, I'm going to shorten it, change it into a blog post style, and submit it to the blog No Sweat Shakespeare for publication, as I've already talked to Ed Goldswain about the possibility of publishing  on the blog.

The Final Stretch: Submissions

I finally got down to submitting my paper!  I went through the process with the scholars archive and then moved on to emailing my paper to the Wooden O Symposium

Here is the abstract that I submitted:



Shakespeare's Othello, one of Shakespeare's most popular tragedies, showcases the works and cunning of one well-known and even well-loved villains, Iago.  Iago is a chameleon of a character easily capable of  manipulating those around him to meet his ends.  All the cleverness and cold calculation homaged, he lacks any definitive motive or driving purpose, merely revenge on the seemingly guiltless Othello.  This determined denial of a motive and extremity of action reflects well Carl Jung, a well-celebrated personality psychologist, and his theory on personality, specifically the "shadow" archetype.  The shadow is an amoral, metaphorical storage center of humankind's propensity to do evil, and Iago seems to be all shadow and all show.  He puts on a good display of variation in character, but he seems driven only by muddled revenge.  Jung's theories, put against Iago's character, reveal him to be a character of depth and have a role in the play and in the overall themes that extends far beyond the contributions of simple stock characters.

Just an intro

I thought I would share the start of my paper, it's almost finished with the review process, but here's a little taste of what I have going so far:


"It is an age-old war raged from the beginning of time: justice versus mercy. In Christian belief the relationship between the two began in the heavens with God’s plan for the Atonement – to have Jesus Christ suffer on the cross to pay the price of justice and provide mercy to the world. And yet still in this day one can struggle daily to find the balance between the two without a proper leading example. In William Shakespeare’s Measure for Measure the character Angelo provides a great example to the human soul and our struggle for justice and mercy within our own selves.
            The Elizabethan Era could be considered a frustrating time for law and order. Punishments for crime were doled out based on class standing (Wagner, 2010). When trials were performed they were almost always designed in favor of the prosecutors, with the victim or defendants refused any legal representative (Wagner, 2010).
            In most reviews of Measure for Measure, Angelo’s character is seen as the antagonist, the scum of the earth- “the wickedness of Angelo is so atrocious” (Bowdler, 2). On top of this, many critics see Angelo as getting off easy from his crime and his unmerciful being. “This monster of iniquity appears before the Duke, defending his cause with unblushing boldness; and after the detection of his crimes, he can scarcely be said to receive any punishment” (Bowdler, 2). Not surprisingly, this review come from a “family” edition of Shakespeare’s plays. It is easy for one to find the need to pick out the good and evil in literature, it is what is taught in every high school English class; it is an easy theme to pick out in any story. Not only that but it creates an easy foundation for teaching moral lessons. But what if the focus was not on the black versus white, the good versus evil, but on showing more of humanity and reality."